WHAT COULD HAVE TRANSPIRED BEHIND THE NEWS IN ADDIS ABABA?

WDM analysis on the diplomatic incident in Addis Ababa between the Somali delegation and Ethiopian security personnel on the eve of 37th Ordinary Annual Session of the AU could be deduced this way: It looks that Prime Minister Ahmed Abiy has tried to meet with Somali President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud to discuss on issues of tension in relations between the two countries, including the recent Ethiopia’s infamous MOU with Northwest Administration of Somalia (Somaliland) under the mediation of Ismail Omar Ghuelleh. It seems that Abiy was annoyed by Mohamud’s outright rejection to discuss them with Abiy, and most probably has ordered his security services to restrict the movements of Somali delegation, preventing them from engaging in diplomatic interactions with other AU leaders. On the top of this diplomatic breach by Ethiopia, the Somali delegation, because of the deteriorating relations with the host country, has declined the services of Ethiopian VIP Security Protection, and opted for using their own accompanying Somali personnel instead. That too further infuriated the Ethiopians.

Such diplomatic restrictions sometimes occur when a host nation receives a delegation from a hostile foreign power or one they have war with. This incident isn’t unique. Americans restrict Cuban, North Korean and Iranian delegations in New York City all the time at UN General Assembly sessions.

In this case, what has happened afterwards was explained adequately by the Somali President, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, himself.

Postscript.

While item No 5 of AU 37th Ordinary Annual Session states in its resolutions on February 17-18th the following:

  1. EXPRESSES DEEP CONCERN over the ongoing tension between the Federal
    Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and the Federal Republic of Somalia, following the
    signing of a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between Ethiopia and the northern
    region of Somalia (Somaliland) on 1 January 2024 and its impact on peace, security
    and stability of the region; REAFFIRMS its strong commitment and support for
    preserving the unity, territorial integrity, independence and sovereignty of all Member
    States, including those of the Federal Republic of Somalia and the Federal Democratic
    Republic of Ethiopia; and therefore, CALLS ON the two countries to de-escalate and
    engage in meaningful dialogue towards finding a peaceful resolution of the matter.[Note the bold text with the insertion of Ethiopian name indicates Ethiopian influence in drafting the resolution].

[This post was edited after posting].

By SomaliDigest (Courtesy)

“General Gordon Camp Attacked by Al-Shabab Infiltrator
A deadly assault within the General Gordon camp in Mogadishu by an Al-Shabab infiltrator targeting UAE military instructors underscores the ongoing challenges of security infiltration in Somalia. The attack resulted in the loss of six officers, highlighting vulnerabilities in the vetting and security protocols. The incident, involving an attacker from a unit recently trained abroad, illustrates the complex issue of internal threats and the pressing need for enhanced security measures. This breach of security within a key military training establishment not only signifies a loss of trust but also calls for a rigorous reevaluation of the recruitment, training, and vetting processes to prevent future infiltrations by extremist elements.

UAE-Somalia Relations: Mixed Reactions to Attack
The response to the attack on UAE trainers in Mogadishu has revealed a spectrum of reactions among Somali political figures, reflecting the intricate interplay of national and regional geopolitics affecting Somalia’s security landscape. Divided opinions within the Somali parliament underscore the complexities of foreign military involvement in Somalia, with some condemning the attack and others questioning the legitimacy of the UAE’s presence. This incident highlights the broader geopolitical rifts, particularly the Gulf Crisis’s impact on Somali politics and its alignment with either Qatar or the UAE. Despite the controversy, the UAE’s significant role in supporting the Somali National Army, especially amidst the ongoing ATMIS drawdown, remains a critical element in Somalia’s strategy for maintaining post-ATMIS security and stability.

Al-Shabab Infiltration Widespread in Mogadishu
The recent attack by an Al-Shabab infiltrator on UAE trainers in Mogadishu highlights the complex threat the group poses to Somalia’s security. This incident, involving a “former” operative turned elite security member, underscores significant vulnerabilities within the government’s vetting and rehabilitation processes. Coupled with the discovery of Al-Shabab members within Mogadishu’s government, these events reveal a deep-rooted infiltration strategy aiming to destabilize from within. The Somali government’s struggle against this sophisticated insurgency is further complicated by internal political distractions, diluting focus from essential security reforms and counter-terrorism efforts”.

International Commercialization of Somalia’s Security Services

WDM EDITORIAL

Somalia is known to have established one of the strongest national armies in Africa during the 1970s. This achievement was made possible when the Soviet Union secured exclusively a “Friendship Treaty” to build Somalia’s National Army. Since the formation of the Federal Government following the Civil War, there has been a continuous increase in the number of security contracts between many foreign powers and Mogadishu’s successive regimes. The training and recruitment of Somali soldiers by multiple international actors has prevented the establishment of an ideologically cohesive national army or security apparatus that truly represents the defense and security needs of this country. Instead, ideologically opposing units of the army are being created. Whether they are being trained by the USA, Britain, Turkey, Uganda, UAE, Eritrea, Qatar, Egypt and even Ethiopia, one can argue that they are not reliable Somali army units. We often hear of clashes between different units trained by various foreign countries. Obviously, this poses a problem for Somalia in terms of achieving a national army that can effectively combat extremists or meet the security needs of the country as a whole.

Even more troublesome is the fact that recruitment for the national army and other security services, including intelligence and police, is mainly drawn from the Banadir Region and its surrounding areas. This leads to the production of sub-clan forces, which is a national problem that is difficult to rectify in order to establish security forces with a national character. More alarming is the fact that most army, police and intelligence services conduct recruitment from former Al-Shabab and clan militia. There is also widespread infiltration of extremist elements not only into the security services but also throughout government departments.

This practice of relying on multiple foreign powers to train our security services must stop, and measures to streamline our security needs must be implemented immediately.

[This article was edited after posting].

POLITICAL, GOVERNANCE AND SECURITY STALEMATE IN SOMALIA

Do you notice any movement in the topics mentioned above? The indirect elections in Puntland State have been completed. However, there has been no progress in the promised democratization process by the President-elect. Reports suggest that the President has not been present at his office since his re-election in January 2024. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud and SFR Speaker of Parliament, Aden Madoobe, are tampering with the Federal Constitution in their efforts to recreate a “City-State”, which was the source of Somalia’s Civil War that has been ongoing for over two decades. Despite President HSM growing his beard and changing his hairstyle to symbolize the fight against extremists in rural areas, AL SHABAB is more assertive than ever. Even armed foreign guests are susceptible to its pervasive influence, not just in Mogadishu. There is no significant activity in other FMS after the Puntland elections. Leaders of these states, whose terms in office are ending, are trying to replicate Puntland’s successful experiment of re-electing a regional leader like Puntland President Said A Deni. In their quest for political survival, some of them may face public rejection and violent opposition, leading to further insurgency and destabilization in their respective regions. All signs point to an ungovernable Somalia under the leadership of Federal President HSM. Meanwhile, Somalis tend to rely on wishful thinking, hoping that things will improve without putting in the hard work needed to enhance their chances of survival as a functional country. Consequently, each new leader’s appointment only creates more wishful thinkers among the general public and apparent ruling elites, hoping to align with the new regime and enjoy the “honeymoon” period. It is a vicious cycle that is difficult to break free from. Do not expect personal or national achievements without investing effort and time into them. Abandon the culture of wishful thinking.

WHY FEDERAL CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT IN SOMALIA IS NECESSARY

WDM EDITORIAL


The Provisional Federal Constitution is obviously dysfunctional and prone to abuse by the Executive. As things stand now, the Federal President took for himself all the powers of the Cabinet – turning the constitutional position of Prime Minister subservient to Villa Somalia. The President is utilizing the weakness and contradictions in the Provisional Constitution in order to exercise one man show. Other people are stuck in the notion that the Constitution is unfinished or incomplete, and until that is done away, nothing moves forward. This is frustrating to all concerned. President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud is, perhaps, justified to move the needle in this constitutional stalemate, in other words, shake things up. However, the President is handling the issue in the wrong way – this is a fundamental national document that requires extensive debates and wider consultations throughout the nation and in all constituencies. It requires time and a lot of public efforts devoid of foreign interferences and meddling beyond constitutional expertise.

By-passing consultations or inputs at constituencies’ level is a dangerous move to unravel the modest gains of two decades through ceasefire of the Civil War, formation of the 2nd Somali Republic and international recognition of the Federal Institutions. Rushing legislations through rubber-stamp parliament will lead to civil unrests and renewed clan confrontations, seeds of new civil wars and mistrust in the central institutions. Let us sober up now and do the right thing right.

‐———————-

While you are here, we request for your support in subscribing to WDM by submitting your annual reader subscription fee of $37 to Sahal account number at +252 90 703 4081 (WhatsApp) or EVCPLUS at 252 611 588 388. You can also use your PayPal account or inter-bank transaction at ismail.warsame@yahoo.ca. Please don’t forget to send us your WhatsApp number to receive WDM articles directly.

PRESIDENT HASSAN SHEIKH MOHAMUD (MSH): DO AND DON’TS

WDM EDITORIAL

Do:

1. Unify FMS to take common policy stance on national governance issues;

2. Build national army and security agencies drawing from all regions of the country;

3. Develop common and consensual economic framework for entire country;

4. Have standard regulations for public servants and service;

5. Eliminate nepotism and cronyism in government appointments and hiring of personnel and perceptions of that nature;

6. Respect 4.5 clan power-sharing formula on merit basis, until the time comes that we are able to do it away;

7. Follow the Provisions of the Federal Constitution and respect the checks and balance of power therein;

8. Consult widely on major legislations and decision-making;

9. Build strong public institutions that last;

10. Establish streamlined, efficient and supported Somali diplomatic embassies.

11. Fight corruption, Alshabab, ignorance, hunger and diseases.

12. Be mindful of government duplications of services, wastefulness and overspenditures.

Don’t:

1. Engage in confrontations with FMS;

2. Support sub-clan based initiatives and projects;

3. Disrespect fine Somali traditions and culture and but enhance them;

4. Shy away from being a proud Somali President for all.

أهمية قمة غاروي المزمعة للحكم في الصومال


منذ إنشاء الجمهورية الصومالية الثانية بعد الحرب الأهلية الطويلة، لم يكن من الممكن تحقيق الاستقرار في المؤسسات العامة.  وذلك لأن قادة الصومال في مرحلة ما بعد الحرب الأهلية لم يتمكنوا من وضع سياسات عامة متماسكة تعتمد على المصالحة الوطنية، كما لم يتمكنوا من التوصل إلى رؤية وطنية للصومال الجديد المتصور.  يعتقد الكثيرون أن البلاد لا تزال منخرطة تقنيًا في استمرار الحرب الأهلية بوسائل أخرى.  هل ستفتح قمة جاروي صفحة جديدة في التخلص من إرث ذلك التاريخ الحزين في عصر جديد من النهضة الوطنية؟  ويشتهر الزعماء السياسيون الصوماليون بصوتهم العالي في الدعوة إلى المصالحة الوطنية، دون أن يتبع ذلك سوى القليل من الإجراءات الملموسة.  إذا كان الأمر كذلك، فستكون فرصة ضائعة أخرى.
إن ما هو على المحك الآن هو بقاء الدولة الصومالية كدولة ديمقراطية فاعلة خالية من تهديدات التطرف والفساد الوبائي وسوء الإدارة.  إن ما أصبح على المحك الآن هو وحدة الصومال كدولة قادرة على البقاء تتمتع بضمانات قوية لسلامة أراضيها وسيادتها الوطنية.  ولا يمكن تحقيق ذلك والحفاظ عليه دون اللحمة الوطنية والمواطنة.  وهذا يتطلب قيادة نكران الذات وتضحيات شخصية من جانب الجميع.  هل نستطيع مواجهة تحديات عصرنا؟
ونطالب بمؤسسات عامة تستجيب لاحتياجات وهموم شعبنا.  نحن نطالب بتقديم خدمات عامة موثوقة.  نحن نطالب بتعليم جيد وفي متناول الجميع.  ونطالب باحترام حقوق الإنسان وسيادة القانون.  ونطالب بالتعبئة الجماهيرية من أجل الوعي المجتمعي والمواطنة الصالحة.  ويجب أن يكون الصومال دولة قومية قوية بين الأمم.  إننا نطالب بمحاسبة الموظفين العموميين، وفي المقام الأول، من المكلفين بإدارة الشأن العام.  ولا يستطيع الصوماليون تحقيق هذه الأهداف دون انتخاب قادتهم السياسيين في انتخابات وطنية.  إن الديمقراطية فوضوية، ولكن ليس هناك بديل.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PLANNED GAROWE SUMMIT FOR SOMALIA’S GOVERNANCE

WDM EDITORIAL

Since the creation of 2nd Somali Republic after the prolonged Civil War, public institutions couldn’t be stabilized. That is because the post-civil war Somalia’s leaders couldn’t devise a coherent public policies based on national reconciliation as they couldn’t come up with national vision for the New Somalia envisioned. Many believe that the country is still technically engaged in the continuation of the Civil War in other means. Would Garowe Summit open a new page in doing away the legacy of that sad history in a new epoch of national renaissance? Somali political leaders are famous for loud voice for national reconciliation with little concrete actions following. If that would be the case, it will be another lost opportunity.

What is at stake now is the existential survival of Somali state as a functioning democracy free from threats of extremism, epidemic corruption and mal-administration. What is at stake is unity of Somalia as a viable state with strong safeguards for its territorial integrity and national sovereignty. This cannot be done and maintained without national cohesion and citizenship. This would require selfless leadership and personal sacrifices on the part of everybody. Can we the meet the challenges of our time?

We demand public institutions responsive to the needs and concerns of our people. We demand reliable public services delivery. We demand quality education accessible to all. We demand respect for human rights and rule of law. We demand mass mobilization for community awareness and good citizenship. Somalia must be a strong nation-state among nations. We demand accountability from public servants, first and foremost, from those entrusted with running public affairs. Somalis cannot achieve these goals without electing their political leaders in a nationwide suffrage. Democracy is messy, but there is no alternative.

PRESIDENT HASSAN SHEIKH MOHAMUD OF SOMALIA: SUB-CLANCRAFT OR STATECRAFT

Just imagine the thinking behind the collection of these clansmen as members of an official Somalia’s state delegation to a European country. “Somalia in peace with itself and with the rest of the world”, produces sub-clancraft administration.

President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud’s official delegation to Italy-Africa Summit Conference.
Members of HSM’s entourage in Rome for Africa-Italy Summit

The current administration of President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud is certainly immune to scams, scandals and corruption.

موجز لتوقعات سكان بونتلاند بشأن الولاية الجديدة للرئيس ديني

افتتاحية إدارة الطلب على المياه
ويتوقع سكان بونتلاند من الرئيس سعيد عبد الله دني برامج عمل واضحة:

تركيب مجلس الوزراء المختص الجديد؛

الشفافية في السياسة العامة والإدارة؛

المصالحة وبناء السلام داخل بونتلاند والصومال على نطاق أوسع؛

استعادة الدور القيادي لولاية بونتلاند في الترتيبات الفيدرالية؛

الاستثمار السليم والعادل في برامج تنمية ولاية بونتلاند، مع إجراء تحسينات كبيرة في البنية التحتية وتقديم الخدمات العامة؛

الالتزام بالقضاء على جيوب التطرف في بونتلاند والصومال؛

القيادة بشأن قضية بونتلاد -SSC:

الالتزام القوي بتعزيز وعي المجتمع باتجاه سياسات ولاية بونتلاند نحو الحكم والدولة في الصومال،
ومن بين أولويات سياسة الدولة الأخرى التي لا تقل أهمية، بما في ذلك الإصلاح الكبير في قطاع التعليم من حيث الجودة والتدريب على المهارات المهنية.

الموسومة

#الشفافية العامة

#بونتلاند #الصومال #الفدرالية

BRIEF PUNTLAND RESIDENTS’ EXPECTATIONS OF PRESIDENT DENI’S NEW MANDATE

WDM EDITORIAL

Puntlanders expect from President Said Abdullahi Deni, with clear programs of action:

  1. Installation of new competent cabinet;
  2. Transparency in public policy and administration;
  3. Reconciliation and peace-building within Puntland and wider Somalia;
  4. Restoration of Puntland State leading role in federal arrangement;
  5. Sound and fair investment in Puntland State development programs, with significant improvements in infrastructure and public services delivery;
  6. Commitment to elimination of pockets of extremism in Puntland and in Somalia;
  7. Leadership on the issue of Puntland-SSC, and
    8: Strong commitment to promotion of community awareness of the direction of Puntland State policies towards Somalia’s governance and statehood,
    among other not less important state policy priorities, including significant reform in education sector in terms of quality and vocational skills training.

FEDERAL ISSUES IN THE USA

Those Somalis who are prompt to criticize Federal Member States demanding accountability from Federal Government should take cues from USA federalism.

NEW: Biden’s deadline to the State of Texas has expired; Governor Abott says his state is prepared for a conflict with federalist forces, and will not back down
For those who don’t know, here’s the summary of what’s happening:

  • Millions of migrants are crossing the U.S. border from Mexico, bringing drugs and crime with them —>
  • U.S. Federal Government does nothing —>
  • Texas uses its national guard and razor wire fences to prevent illegal immigrants from invading —>
  • U.S. Supreme Court rules that razor wire is ‘inhumane’, and the federal government orders Texas to remove it —>

Texas has had enough, and ignores the federal government. Over 25 republican governors and their states pledge to support Texas in their right to defend their territory in defiance of the federal government.
NEW: Over 10 states have sent their National Guard to support Texas – Abbott
NEW: Biden freezes all new LNG (Liquid Natural Gas) export contracts, which the State of Texas is heavily dependent on.

WDM TAKEAWAYS OF PUNTLAND PRESIDENT DENI’S INAUGURATION CEREMONY IN GAROWE TODAY

1. It was well attended by who is who in Somalia’s political elite at Federal and member-state levels, including the President of the Federal Republic, Hassan Sheikh Mohamud.

2. Puntland State has showcased the outcome of its recent presidential election, despite known imperfections and initial election violence in Garowe involving One Person One Vote. It was agreed by all attending, however, that it was comparatively commendable exercise of democracy as Puntland State has set the record to be an exemplary for the rest of Somalia.

3. Speeches by attending leaders turned out mainly to be indirect and soft-spoken debates on how Somalia could move forward on issues of governance, constitution-making and unity to address its national challenges, amidst threats to its security and sovereignty by Alshabab and neighboring Ethiopia.

4. There were subtle electioneering speeches, though, by some former federal prime ministers, Hassan Ali Khayre and Hussein Rooble, in particular, and presidents of Federal Member States like AbdulAsis Laftegreen and Ahmed Abdi Kariye (Qoor Qoor). These electioneering speeches were both for national and regional consumption with some heads of Federal Member States keen to take cues from rare re-election of a sitting leader as President Said Abdullahi Deni did.

5. UN and EU chiefs/representatives present at ceremony expressed their usual Mudane, uninspiring commitment to support Puntland/Somalia.

6. Ministerial representatives from Kenya and Ethiopia present avoided the thorny issue of Ethio-Somali dispute on Red Sea access by Ethiopia through unconventional means.

7. Puntland President Said A Deni pledged to commit himself to work towards achieving Puntland State unity and cooperation with the Federal Government.

8. Noticeable was absence of Jubaland State from this important gathering of Somalia’s leaders, for whatever reasons.

9. In assessment of what has transpired here and the fact that the ceremony was well attended by most leaders of Somalia, the event showed the undeniable political weight of Puntland State in shaping up The New Somalia.

10: And on a light note, remarks by Aden Dualle, Hussein Rooble and AbdulAsis Laftegreen were full of humor and figurative language, attracting applause from the audience.

Postscript

In his remarks, former Prime Minister Ali Mohamed Gedi continued to stock his usual beat of being the First Minister installed, starting debate on transitional TFG Charter while demanding to be recognized as such in protocol, while former Prime Minister Saacid Shirdoon complained about lack of empathy for the plight of residents in Gedo affected by floods.

[This article has been updated after posting].

WDM has made to Medioq!

Exciting News! We are thrilled to be featured on Medioq, a premier platform connecting individuals with top-notch media, news, and broadcasting companies worldwide. Explore our profile to stay informed, entertained, and connected with the latest news and updates: https://www.medioq.com/CA/Toronto/1821205281277945/Ismail-Warsame”

Haaretz: Israel breathes its last while we face the most difficult Prime Time Zone [people]

12/05/2021 The Israeli newspaper “Haaretz” published an article by the famous writer (Ari Shebet), in which he bites fingers of remorse over the occupation of historic Palestine, saying (It seems that we are facing the most difficult Prime Time Zone in history, and there is no solution with them except recognition of their rights and […]

Haaretz: Israel breathes its last while we face the most difficult Prime Time Zone [people]

WHAT OPTIONS DOES SOMALIA HAVE TO COUNTER ETHIOPIAN THREAT UNDER ADDIS MOU?

WDM EDITORIAL

By issuing this infamous MOU with a regional administration of Northwest Regions of Somalia (Somaliland), Ethiopia has directly violated the sovereignty and territorial integrity of her neighbor Somalia in total disregard of historical burden between the two countries. It looks that the Ethiopian leader, Abiy Ahmed, is a poor student of history. Even his late boss, Melez Zenawi, fared better with regards to Ethio-Somali centuries-old relationships. He is also a poor reader of current affairs, political and security climate of the region and beyond. Not to talk about the security and economic calamities of his own country, he isn’t reading about the threat of extremism and religious fanatics to both nations and further. Cooperation for mutual benefits between nations isn’t, perhaps, in his books, thus making him among the most dangerous leaders in the world. Clearly, his ill-gotten Nobel Prize is a demonstration of mockery of the Norwegian Institution.

For Somalia, what options does she have to counter this grave and existential threat from Ethiopia? Is diplomatic offensive alone to expose Ethiopian aggression enough? Is rupture of all diplomatic ties with that country an option? Is offering foreign military bases to seemingly friendly countries in Somalia to counter-balance Ethiopia’s another option? Is seizing Somaliland Administration by Somali armed forces a way out to neutralize this renewed Ethiopian threat? What isn’t an option for Somalia, under any circumstance though, is negotiation with the aggressor on Somalia’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. Period.

Have your say.

The Somali Youth League, Ethiopian Somalis andthe Greater Somalia Idea, c.1946–48

Journal of Eastern African Studies

ISSN: 1753-1055 (Print) 1753-1063 (Online)Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/rjea20

Dr Cedric Barnes

To cite this article: Dr Cedric Barnes (2007) The Somali Youth League, Ethiopian Somalis and
the Greater Somalia Idea, c.1946–48,Journal of Eastern African Studies, 1:2, 277-291, DOI:
10.1080/17531050701452564
To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17531050701452564

Published online: 24Jul 2007.

Submit your article to this journal

Article views: 1304

View related articles

Citing articles: 4 View citing articles

Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rjea20

Journal of Eastern African Studies
Vol. 1, No. 2, 277- 291, July 2007

The Somali Youth League, Ethiopian Somalis and the Greater Somalia Idea, c.1946-48

CEDRIC BARNES
School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London

ABSTRACT From 1946 to 1948 the Somali Youth Club (SYC) grew from a small Mogadishu based urban self-help group into a burgeoning nationalist organisation calling for the unification of all the Somali-speaking lands into Greater Somalia, changing its name to the ‘Somali Youth League’ (SYL) in the process. The reason for this rapid expansion and radicalisation was a conjuncture of several factors, but it is most immediately attributable to the international deliberations over the future of the Italian East African Empire. In 1946 the international community began to address the future of the Italian Empire, and the British raised the possibility of creating a Greater Somalia administration (under British trusteeship) as a basis for future independence. The SYC, which had until then concentrated on a more limited and arguably more achievable political programme for the furtherance of Somali interests in ex-Italian Somalia, became mesmerised by the idea of Greater Somalia. Greater Somalia became a popular rallying call for the expanding nationalist project. However, as this article argues, although the Greater Somalia project galvanised the SYC into a mass nationalist organisation (the SYL), the expansion of its activities into the greater Somalia hinterland, such as the Ethiopian Ogaden region, brought different priorities and perspectives to project. The differing histories of clans and regions dissipated the cohesion, discipline and aims of the SYL at a crucial historical juncture. Ultimately the SYL was unable to create a Greater Somalia, nor prevent the repartition of the Somali- lands and the return of former colonial and imperial powers.

From 1946 to 1948 the Somali Youth Club (SYC) grew from a small Mogadishu based urban self-help organisation into a burgeoning nationalist organisation calling for the unification of all the Somali-speaking lands into Greater Somalia, changing its name to the ‘Somali Youth League’ (SYL) in the process. The reason for the rapid expansion and radicalisation of the SYC/L was a conjuncture of several factors, but it is most immediately attributable to the international deliberations over the future of the Italian East African Empire. In 1946 the international community began to address the future of the Italian Empire, and the British raised the possibility of creating a Greater Somalia administration (under British trusteeship) as a basis for future independence. The SYC, which hitherto had concentrated on a more limited and arguably more achievable political programme for the furtherance of Somali interests in ex-Italian Somalia, became mesmerised by the idea of Greater Somalia. Once the idea of Greater Somalia gained public currency it became a popular rallying call for the expanding nationalist project.

Correspondence Address: Dr. Cedric Barnes, Department of History, School of Oriental and African Studies, London WC1H 0XG, UK. E-mail: cb62@soas.ac.uk
ISSN 1753-1055 Print/1753-1063 Online/07/020277 – 15 # 2007 Taylor & Francis
DOI: 10.1080/17531050701452564

278 C. Barnes

However, as this article argues, although the Greater Somalia project galvanised the SYC into a mass nationalist organisation (the SYL), the expansion of its activities into the greater Somalia hinterland, such as the Ethiopian Ogaden region, brought different priorities and perspectives to the project. The differing histories of clans and regions included in the Greater Somalia project dissipated the cohesion, discipline and aims of the SYL at a crucial historical juncture. Ultimately the SYL was unable to create a Greater Somalia, nor prevent the repartition of the Somali-lands and the return of former colonial and imperial powers.

Territorial Divisions in the Somali-lands
The territorial divisions of the Somali inhabited lands of Northeast Africa had been a problem from the outset of colonial administration in the Horn of Africa. In the late nineteenth century, the growing Ethiopian Empire and the Ethiopian defeat of the Italian colonial army at Adwa in 1896 made Ethiopia a direct threat to colonial possessions and spheres of influence in the region. Faced with an armed and aggressive African state, European colonial powers in the Somali-lands were forced to curtail their territorial claims for the sake of greater imperial stratagems.1 Colonial administrators in British Somaliland saw the territorial concession to Ethiopia as a mistake and the subsequent boundary agreement as unworkable, storing up problems for the future. The boundary with Ethiopia became an obsession upon which the many woes of an economically poor and administratively volatile colony were blamed. A similar case applied to Italian Somalia.2 However to the Ethiopians, for whom their independence and sovereign territory became an article of faith, any adjustment to colonial boundaries seemed like a concession to colonial aggrandisement. Soon, however, all the Somali-lands became engulfed in the twenty-year ‘Dervish’ religious revolt led by Sayyid Maxamad Cabdille Xasan, forcing Ethiopia, Britain and Italy to cooperate, and the differences over the boundaries faded from view.
In the 1920s and 1930s, as ‘peaceful’ administration returned to the borderland areas between the colonial Somali-lands and the Ethiopian Empire, the unresolved boundary issues came back into view. Throughout the inter-war period there were continual skirmishes on the boundaries between the Somali-lands, not only between the colonial administrations and Ethiopia, but also between the colonial administrations themselves.3 However it was on the boundary with Italian Somalia at the wells of Wal Wal that the issue became altogether more serious. A clash between Italian and Ethiopian border patrols well inside the Ethiopian boundary in the Ogaden region provided the pretext for the Italian invasion of Ethiopia. Despite the international outcry that the Italian annexation of Ethiopia occasioned, the absorption of the Ethiopian Empire into the Italian empire was quickly recognised by the British whose colonial territories shared the longest boundary with Ethiopia. After the invasion of Ethiopia in 1935- 36, the Italian Empire incorporated Eritrea, Ethiopia and Italian Somalia into one regional bloc of semi- autonomous governorships and rationalised some of the old international boundaries. One of the most significant adjustments the Italian Empire made was the creation of a much larger Somali administration by excising the Ogaden region from the Ethiopian governorships and combining it with the coastal colony of Italian Somaliland, creating a ‘greater’ Italian Somalia.

The SYL, Ethiopian Somalis and the Greater Somalia Idea 279
Britain’s initial sympathy and cooperation with the enlarged Italian Empire ended abruptly with the Italian entry into the Second World War, on the ‘wrong’ side. In 1940, as France capitulated and Italy joined the Axis powers, suddenly the Italian Empire changed from a benign modern administration (the very opposite, it was thought, of the ex-Ethiopian Empire), to a belligerent power in the midst of the British Empire in Africa. After initially successful Italian offensives, including the brief invasion and occupation of the British Somaliland Protectorate, British and Commonwealth forces aided by Ethiopian exiles and internal ‘patriot’ resistance defeated the Italian forces in East Africa. The collapse of the Italian East African Empire came surprisingly quickly, and the upshot of this rapid victory was the need for a British Military Administration (BMA hereafter) over the Empire’s vast area, now designated as Occupied Enemy Territory (since the Italian conquest had been legally recognised by the British in 1938). The occupation of this territory, justified as a military necessity, then became entwined with larger and older imperial questions in northeast Africa, such as frontier rectification and rationalisation.4 However, the British maintained territorial adjustments made by the Italians for the duration of the war, and left decisions over the future of the Italian Empire until the projected post-war peace conferences.
For the first year after the Italian defeat in 1941, the former Ethiopian Empire was administered as Occupied Enemy Territory since it was viewed as part of the Italian Empire. However the designation of Ethiopia as Occupied Enemy Territory was complicated by the presence of the Emperor of Ethiopia, Haile Sellasie, who had returned with the British Army. A formal political relationship between the BMA and the Emperor needed to be established and the result was the 1942 Anglo-Ethiopian agreement,5 which handed back a certain amount of administrative control to the Emperor over much of the former Ethiopian Empire, although the Emperor’s sovereign power was severely limited. Moreover, under the 1942 agreement (reluctantly agreed to by the Emperor), the BMA retained complete control over the railway line to Addis Ababa, the eastern railway town of Dire Dawa, and the eastern borderlands with French, Italian and British Somali-lands. The north-eastern part of this territory, including the borderlands with British Somaliland, known as the Hawd, and the main market town of Jigjiga (the traditional centre for Ethiopian government of their Somali borderlands), was known as the Reserved Areas (RA hereafter) and had its own small BMA administration. The south-eastern borderlands, the vast plains known as the Ogaden, that the Italians had excised from Ethiopia added to Italian Somalia, continued to be administered from Mogadishu (the capital of Italian Somalia) under a larger separate BMA. It is important to note here that although the British did not deny Ethiopian sovereignty over the RA and the Ogaden, they did not they clearly acknowledge it either. Moreover, as long as significant parts of Ethiopian territory remained under BMA, the British had a certain amount of leverage over the restored Ethiopian government, and retained the possibility of the territorial adjustments that the surrounding British colonies might desire. Plans and arguments for Greater Somalia and territorial adjustments in Northeast Africa constantly figure in the archival record for this period, demonstrating that in the minds of the British the future of the RA and the Ogaden was implicitly bound up with the fate of the ex-Italian Somaliland, to be decided at the end of the war.6
Despite the restoration of the Emperor Haile Sellasie to his throne, from 1941 to 1948 a significant proportion of the pre-1936 Ethiopian Empire was directly ruled by Britain as part of a de facto Greater Somalia administration. The restoration Ethiopian government,

280 C. Barnes
in nationalistic mood, baulked at the continuing curtailment of its sovereignty, but given the circumstances it could dolittle. Over the next few years, as the Ethiopian government gained strength and coherence, gradually assuming more territorial sovereignty, the Emperor’s officials began to press for the return of the eastern fringes of its Empire still under the BMA. During 1946 the BMA withdrew from Dire Dawa and the railway, but continued to administer a reduced Reserved Area of the Jigjiga district and the Hawd borderlands with British Somaliland. The Ogaden area continued to be ruled under the BMA of Italian Somalia. However, within the stipulations of a further Anglo-Ethiopian agreement of 1944, the Ethiopian government could give the BMA notice to quit Ethiopian territory (i.e. the RA and the Ogaden) within three months. The Ethiopian government did not do so for another two years, but meanwhile Somali nationalist organisations had begun to grow in ex-Italian Somalia, and their influence spread into the Somali inhabited areas of the Ethiopian Empire.7

The Somali Youth Club
The first Somali clubs and professional organisations had begun before the war in British and Italian Somali-lands but these were fairly small-scale organisations.8 However the social and economic experience of the expanded Italian empire, world war and the promise of a new post-war order under BMA had an encouraging affect on Somali political activity, and the most concrete result was the first recognisably Somali ‘nationalist’ organisation, the Somali Youth Club. Founded in Mogadishu on 15 May 1943, the club originally acted as an urban self-help organisation mostly restricted to Mogadishu.9 It was established against a background of wartime uncertainties, especially high food prices in urban markets dominated by non-Somali Arabs and Indian traders, and a rapidly increased population due to large numbers of demobilised soldiery.10 Club membership was restricted to Somalis between the ages of 18 and 32, drawn from what a British report described as the newly emerged ‘middle class’ of Somali, especially private traders and young men from monthly-salaried groups such as government clerks, servants of Europeans, medical dressers, and members of the Somalia Gendarmerie. By 1947 approximately 75 percent of the Somalia Gendarmerie stationed in Mogadishu were members of the club.11
By the mid-1940s, from its base in Mogadishu, the SYC began to spread to other urban centres in former Italian Somalia. As the club expanded in range and membership, its initial social welfare role developed into a more ambitious programme for the unification and progress of the Somali people. The club wished to confront and break down the pervasive clan system of Somali society and end divisive clan disputes, and promoted education and social improvement programmes.12 Although it appears that the club was an indigenous initiative, it was quickly recognised as a useful auxiliary organisation by the young and inexperienced BMA in ex-Italian Somalia, so hastily established after the unexpectedly rapid collapse of the Italian colonial armies in 1941.13 There developed a very close relationship between the BMA and the SYC in the early years. Club members appeared to be Anglophiles, and English classes given by teachers from the government schools were an important feature of club life. The British clearly regarded the club favourably; their only concern was an oath taken which bound the members not to reveal clan affiliation,but to admit only to being Somali, a practice that went against the British ideal of indirect rule.

التهديد الوجودي الإثيوبي لسيادة الصومال

افتتاحية WDM

ان طموحات إثيوبيا الإمبراطورية تجاه أراضي الصومال

وبحرها ليست جديدة.  يمكن للمرء أن يقول إن إثيوبيا لم تفكر مطلقًا بكل إخلاص في الاعتراف بالصومال كدولة ذات سيادة، ورفضتها تاريخيًا باعتبارها “مجموعة من العشائر البدوية” التي تتجول، وفقًا للإمبراطور الراحل هيلا سيلاسي.  ولذلك تعتبر إثيوبيا أرض الصومال إحدى هذه القبائل الصومالية التي يمكنها الدخول فيها في “معاهدة عشائرية” كما اعتادت القوى الاستعمارية الأوروبية أن تفعل لاحتلال الأراضي الأفريقية.  تواجه الصومال تحديات ومهام ضخمة أمامها للدفاع عن أراضيها وسيادتها بشكل لم يسبق له مثيل، وتعبئة الهيئات الدولية، وأصدقاء الصومال، والأهم من ذلك، سكانها لمواجهة هذا التهديد الوجودي الإثيوبي المتجدد بجرأة.  وهنا، يجب احترام القانون الدولي لفضح الطبيعة العدوانية والخروج على القانون لرئيس وزراء النظام الإثيوبي أبي أحمد.

#الصومال #إثيوبيا

ETHIOPIAN EXISTENTIAL THREAT TO SOMALIA’S SOVEREIGNTY

WDM EDITORIAL

Ethiopia’s imperial ambitions towards Somalia’s territory and sea isn’t new. One could say that Ethiopia never full-heartedly considered recognition of Somalia as a sovereign nation, historically dismissing her as a “bunch of nomadic clans” wandering around, according to Late Emperor Haile Selassie. Ethiopia 🇪🇹 therefore considers Somaliland as one of these Somali tribes it can enter into a “clan treaty” as European colonial powers used to do to occupy African territories. Somalia 🇸🇴 has a huge challenges and tasks cut out for her to defend its territory and sovereignty like never before, mobilizing international bodies, friends of Somalia, and most importantly, its population to confront boldly this renewed Ethiopian existential threat. Here, international law must be upheld to expose the aggressive nature and lawlessness of Prime Minister Abyi Ahmed of the Ethiopian regime.

POLITICAL VIOLENCE CANNOT BE REWARDED


In 2004 Transitional Federal Government (TFG) election, Abdullahi Yusuf, then President-elect was asked why didn’t he appoint a prime minister hailing from Habar-Gedir Hawiye subclan? His answer was astounding. He raised the question: “Who has captured and holds still non- native Somali territories by force? Shall we also reward them with leadership roles in my government?”

In assessing most recent political election in Puntland State, the outcome was not surprising to many. There was severe election violence in the heart and Seat of Puntland Government, Garowe, the Capital City. Few doubted that this would have tremendous impact on the Presidential Election this time around. Presidential candidates implicated in Garowe and Bosaso election violence during Puntland Council Elections performed poorly in this Presidential Election. They have also earned the ire of residents of other regions of the State. Hopefully, this mediocre result of this Presidential Election will serve both as a useful lesson and reminder that violence for political objectives won’t pay, and remaining local councils be allowed to proceed in Nugaal immediately. Puntland State needs peaceful development, civilized debate and discourse in managing public affairs.

However, the only silver-lining in recent Garowe political experiences is that the infamous so-called “Entitlement” for the post of Puntland Presidency is over, and that parliament selection by traditional clan system has finally hit the rocks and ran into dead-end. So be it.

While you are here, please consider supporting WDM with your Annual Subscription of $37 only. Send it to Sahal number at +252 90 703 4081.

في أعقاب الحملات الانتخابية المريرة، انقشع الغبار أخيراً في بونتلاند


والآن بعد أن انتهت انتخابات بونتلاند وتم تسويتها، دعونا نتحرك بشكل موحد لتحسين سبل عيش سكاننا وإعادة تأكيد الدور القيادي لهذه الولاية في عملية المصالحة وإعادة الإعمار في الصومال.  لقد ارتكبت ولاية بونتلاند أخطاء سياسية، ومن الضروري الآن تصحيحها.  وبينما يتعين علينا جميعا أن نهنئ الرئيس ونائب الرئيس المنتخب على فوزهما في الانتخابات، علينا أن نواصل الضغط عليهما للتحرك من أجل حكم أفضل وبناء مؤسسات سليمة وشفافية في إدارة الشؤون العامة في بونتلاند.
إن إرساء الديمقراطية ووحدة الهدف وتحسين الأداء الاقتصادي وتوفير بيئة آمنة للنمو والازدهار هي من بين أولوياتنا كدولة.
بالنسبة للرئيس سعيد عبد الله دني، فقد انتهى منحنى التعلم ولم يعد هناك أي مبرر للتأخير في إدارة برنامج عمل بفعالية وكفاءة لإحداث تغييرات إيجابية في حياة الناس العاديين.
إن سياسة الدولة المتمثلة في إعادة المشاركة وإعادة المساهمة مع بقية الصومال والمجتمع الدولي أمر ضروري.  يجب على ولاية بونتلاند إعادة احتلالها والقيام بدورها التاريخي في شؤون الصومال والمساعدة في إعادة تشكيل مستقبله

بقلم WDM

FOLLOWING BITTER ELECTION CAMPAIGNS THE DUST HAS FINALLY SETTLED IN PUNTLAND

WDM EDITORIAL

Now that Puntland election is over and settled, let us move in unison to improve the livelihoods of our residents and re-assert the leading role of this state in Somalia’s reconciliation and reconstruction process. Puntland State has made policy mistakes, and it is imperative now to rectify them. While we all have to congratulate the President and Vice-president-elect for their election victory, we have to keep the pressure on them to move for better governance, sound institution-building and transparency in running Puntland public affairs.

Democratization, unity in purpose, better economic performance and secure environment for growth and prosperity are among our priorities as a state.

For President Said Abdullahi Deni, the learning curve is done and no further excuses for delays in managing effectively and competently a program of action to bring about positive changes in the lives of ordinary people.

A state policy of re-engagement and re-contribution with the rest of Somalia and international community is imperative. Puntland state must re-occupy and play its historical role in Somalia’s affairs and help re-shape its future.

HISTORIC, STRATEGIC AND POLITICAL MISCALCULATIONS OF PUNTLAND OPPOSITION

WDM EDITORIAL

People of Puntland State had spoken loud and clear when they lined up for the election of city councils in their thousands. Puntland opposition elements didn’t get this popular message, instead insisting on indirect selection of Puntland political leadership. Now, it doesn’t matter who selects the members of the House, the incumbent president or a nomadic elder, the result isn’t democratic election either way. Now those who opposed to even holding election of city councils yesterday have no case today to complain about their ugly legacy of misinterpreting popular discontent with the old clan-based system of selection that has outlived its usefulness long time ago. It isn’t still too late to learn from historic mistakes and political/strategic miscalculations of yesteryears. The way forward for Puntland State of Somalia is clear now. IPIV is the only way. Get the message!